|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 20:47:13 GMT 9.5
This thread was clean on this morning!
|
|
|
Post by Marie-Cris on Mar 20, 2008 21:01:41 GMT 9.5
Oh wicked, wicked US. Some brave knight should come along and give US a good spanking.
...
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 21:05:05 GMT 9.5
US or us?
|
|
|
Post by Marie-Cris on Mar 20, 2008 21:06:52 GMT 9.5
Well we're all to blame - at least those who've posted. I only count those who've posted as actual members - until they speak they're just ... there.
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 21:13:44 GMT 9.5
Actually, I was referring to the second "US" in that spoiler.
|
|
|
Post by Marie-Cris on Mar 20, 2008 21:17:10 GMT 9.5
Oh. I was meant to write "us all". I think I've been writing US so often lately that it's been sat to automatic ...
... like when I end up typing "Anthony" instead of words like "Anything" and "Anyway".
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 21:24:11 GMT 9.5
"Us all" = better. Though maybe not David or Josh or any of the other guys. Or Lauren or Bec etc. because that's illegal.
I keep misspelling "petition" as "peition." XD
|
|
|
Post by klh44 on Mar 20, 2008 21:31:35 GMT 9.5
After my friends and I got back from Melbourne las time I saw Phantom, we went into withdrawal, so one weekend we all got together to watch the movie. Bad Idea. the best quote from the night was from my friend Jess; "This Raoul is more deformed than the Phantom!"
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 21:56:44 GMT 9.5
^ The movie just makes the cravings worse, I found! XD
That Raoul was bad even by Raoul standards. He just looked... pudgy.
|
|
|
Post by Marie-Cris on Mar 20, 2008 22:05:52 GMT 9.5
I think the worst looking Raoul award is a tie between movie Raoul and video clip Roulett
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 22:07:15 GMT 9.5
^ The one with the mullet? Yeah, he wins...
...a punjabbing. Pickles would be wasted on one such as he.
|
|
|
Post by klh44 on Mar 20, 2008 22:08:26 GMT 9.5
^I learnt that lesson fast. But now theres only what, 6 months till the LSS? theres a light at the end of the tunnel *dance*
|
|
|
Post by Marie-Cris on Mar 20, 2008 22:08:41 GMT 9.5
Besides, that would be ignoring the sign:
"DON'T FEED THE ANIMALS"
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Mar 20, 2008 22:10:55 GMT 9.5
^I learnt that lesson fast. But now theres only what, 6 months till the LSS? theres a light at the end of the tunnel It's the only thing keeping me going! *thumbsup* Besides, that would be ignoring the sign: "DON'T FEED THE ANIMALS" We could feed him to Hyde.
|
|
|
Post by klh44 on Mar 20, 2008 22:17:24 GMT 9.5
We could feed him to Hyde. oh so tempting...
|
|
|
Post by killerbananas on Mar 23, 2008 16:05:18 GMT 9.5
I finally tracked down the Charles Dance version (for $5). Not as bad as I thought it would be, although I had a laugh or two. But much much better than I expected!
(At least he didn't have an affinity for rats)
|
|
|
Post by jayko on Mar 23, 2008 16:26:44 GMT 9.5
Yeah the Charles Dance one isn't too bad
I finally got around to watching the 1989 version with Robert Englund. It was... different!!
|
|
|
Post by killerbananas on Mar 23, 2008 16:41:40 GMT 9.5
The weird thing is I expect them all to suck (thanks to the Lloyd-Webber version for that) but they turn out to be decent. Especially if you leave the musical-verse behind, the ones I've seen all work quite well.
|
|
|
Post by jayko on Mar 23, 2008 17:46:18 GMT 9.5
The ones I've seen have been ok so far, next on my list is Phantom of the Paradise.
|
|
|
Post by PhantomPhanatic on May 14, 2008 20:10:08 GMT 9.5
Hey
I Absolutely loved the 2004 film when it ame out but as soon as i saw Leila Benn Harris and Earl Carpenter and company on 2nd June 2007 (so remember it) and then th 2004 film wasn't the best anymore (no offecne) when you see the boat in the stage show it doesn't even compare anymore.
I do love Emmy's voiuce in the film t is so angelice especailly in POTO song:D
|
|
|
Post by killerbananas on May 15, 2008 19:20:04 GMT 9.5
The ones I've seen have been ok so far, next on my list is Phantom of the Paradise. My advice for that is try not to focus on the "Phantomness" of it- constantly comapring it to more traditional phantoms kills it. If you watch it just as a stand-alone film its actually quite enjoyable!
|
|
|
Post by klh44 on Jun 11, 2008 12:43:04 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by Joshrls on Jun 11, 2008 13:09:01 GMT 9.5
Nicel, its funny cause its true....................Butler want a punjab withthat???
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Jun 11, 2008 13:11:55 GMT 9.5
That should be definition #1! Except for the "Destler" part. *punjabs* (Love the icon, btw.)
|
|
|
Post by klh44 on Jun 11, 2008 13:17:28 GMT 9.5
I just love the example that they use, because it's true.
(Thankyou. it sums up my mood perfectly at the moment. I'm trying to cram a semester of Biology into my head before Friday.)
|
|
|
Post by unwinding_fantasy on Jun 11, 2008 13:21:58 GMT 9.5
Anthony isn't defined yet...
...but then, I don't want his precious name on urbandictionary. >)_>
|
|
|
Post by klh44 on Jun 11, 2008 13:28:56 GMT 9.5
I wouldn't risk it. someone will just come up with a porn definition for him. Take a look at the entry for Phantom of the opera.
|
|